transcript – how has schooling changed over time
4:13 / 4:13
- In western culture, approaches to teaching and learning have shifted over time.
- While it’s not a tidy timeline, in very broad terms, compulsory and universal public
- education was largely a product of the industrial age.
- Prior to that, education was largely reserved for the privileged – nobility, wealthy landowners
- and clergy, for instance.
- But new technology – the printing press, trains, electricity and so on – meant that more people
- had access to knowledge and also that people needed new kinds of knowledge and skills.
- So new approaches to education developed in response.
- What we often refer to as ‘traditional’ mass schooling was designed to prepare people
- to take their places in this new society.
- This approach to education aimed to produce compliant and punctual workers.
- The teacher was the ‘sage on the stage’ – the holder of knowledge and the ultimate
- authority figure.
- Students were viewed as empty vessels waiting to be filled with knowledge – certain knowledge,
- of course, not of their own choosing.
- The physical environment was one of hierarchy and control – desks in rows, children facing
- their teacher who controlled subject matter, talk, and activities from the front of the
- room.
- The focus was on rote learning and correctly recalling information.
- Across time, this has shifted – mercifully!
- That’s not to say that teacher-directed learning episodes don’t have their place;
- indeed they do.
- Nor is it to say that the ‘chalk and talk’ model is extinct or always undesirable, because
- it isn’t.
- But we no longer live in an industrial age.
- Twenty-first century life is very different and it isn’t effective to keep on trying
- to pump out students like a production line.
- We live in what is sometimes called the information or digital age.
- The kinds of skills that students need if they are to thrive in this contemporary world
- are quite different from the past.
- I am not simply referring to the kinds of skills we associate with digital technology,
- although of course technology has contributed significantly to the changed educational landscape
- we now occupy.
- As a result, approaches to education have shifted from a teacher or knowledge centred
- approach to a student or learner centred approach.
- Contemporary pedagogical frameworks, such as constructivism, encourage learners to ‘construct’
- their own knowledge individually and collaboratively by making connections with prior knowledge
- and experiences.
- We might even say that in the past, surface learning was sufficient – memorizing facts,
- selecting the correct answer and so on.
- But to be equipped for today’s world, surface learning is not enough.
- Today’s ‘facts’ may not be facts next year.
- Today’s ‘skills’ may be obsolete within a decade.
- The kinds of approaches associated with deep learning – approaches that develop higher
- order skills, encourage critical thinking, and the capacity to be agile, flexible and
- adaptable – these skills are not optional or reserved for a small percentage of learners,
- they are critical for all students.
- Now, teachers know this and, I think, want to be the kinds of teachers who design learning
- experiences that equip learners with these skills.
- But of course, the question is how?
Effective and Active learning
- Robyn: Research shows that student-centred approaches to teaching that change and develop
- students’ thinking gets better student learning outcomes than the more traditional, teacher-directed,
- information-transmission approaches.
- For teachers to make this shift, it’s important to have the capacity to reflect on one’s
- own practice and to be familiar with evidence-based research into effective teaching.
- To be effective, learning must be active.
- So effective and active learning are interdependent and one cannot occur without the other.
- They are two sides of the same coin.
- When learning is effective, students are actively engaged and they are motivated.
- They accept responsibility for their learning, work together to achieve shared goals, listen
- to others’ ideas, and support one another through challenges.
- So the effectiveness of active learning is not limited to the academic or cognitive,
- but extends to social and personal development.
Constructivist Theory
Sensorimotor stage: Developing motor control and learning about physical objects.
Pre-operational stage: Developing verbal skills, naming objects and reasoning skills.
< i think dylan’s in transition between these 2 stages>
Concrete operational stage: Developing skills to learn about abstract concepts, numbers and relationships.
Formal operational stage: Developing skills to reason logically and systematically.
PIAGET’S THEORY OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
![Image of Piaget stage development with animated images at each](https://courses.edx.org/assets/courseware/v1/e0a0bbd9061c521be3103f9114478d07/asset-v1:UQx+LEARNx+1T2020+type@asset+block/7.1.1_d-01.png)
Vygotsky’s Social Cultural Learning Theory (SCLT) was based on the idea that social interaction is fundamental for cognitive development.